|
|
Hi @Johnicholas, In Rationale you construct an argument- or reconstruct an argument out of a given text - in a pyramidal form. Each reason is - in the eye of the reason giver - a piece of evidence in support of the claim immediately above it, and only for that claim. There is no workaround here in such a way that you can visually connect one and the same claim to two or more claims in different branches. A solution is, indeed, by copy&paste the claim. Timo ter Berg |
by
timo
|
In your My maps: type a name for a folder in the box: 'add folder' above at the right at give an Enter. Btw: please start a new thread when you have a message that is not related to an existing thread. |
by
timo
|
Hi, Can somebody tell me how to create a folder? I have a lot of files and can't organize them in folders. I appreciate your help. A |
|
Be nice! Make everyone feel welcome to participate in the conversation. Be constructive! Assume and demonstrate good faith. Take a tone of actionable, professional, and courteous suggestions. Be specific! When applicable, make your map public and include it with your post, or include a screenshot or photo of your project.
I understand that Rationale depends on most arguments being tree-shaped, in order to do layout quickly and attractively.
However, in reality once a statement is established, it is entirely possible to use it more than once - that is, there are arguments that are directed acyclic graphs, but not trees.
Is there a standard way to work around the tree default?